Question to the compendium - ID: 385: Difference between revisions

From Silversword RPG Wiki
en>sswikiadmin
No edit summary
 
m (1 revision imported)
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 17:57, 24 March 2024

FORUM: Guides, Spoilers and Walkthroughs

This topic was started by Rand on 24/01/2012, 17:29:52

First of all a big compliment for this amazing game. I really enjoy playing it. I have a small question to the compendium and couldn't find any explanation in the compendium or the forum:
On the creatures table there is a min and max attack range. What do these values mean? Also it would be helpful if the header row would be repeated on each page.
Sorry, if this is a stupid question, but I couldn't figure it out so far.


Hello Rand,

thank you very much for your suggestion. I will implement the header on each page in a future update :-)

The min attack range is the minimum distance at which this type of creature will appear multiplied by 10 feet.
The max attack range is the maximum distance at which this type of creature will appear multiplied by 10 feet.

As you might know, melee range is 10'... and max range is 90' - so the min and max values should be somewhere within 1 to 9.

Regards
Mario


Hi, Wehre can i buy the compandium?
Regards, grunz


(answered you via PM)

but for all other readers:

You can buy the compendium in the full version only via the Shop button on the settings screen.
This did not work in version 2.04, so please update to the latest version.

Regards
Mario


Hi Mario,

Thanks for the quick reply. It makes sense, however it seems to me that this is not always the case. I had many times Dark Pilgrims or Goblin Ruffians appearing at 10'. Are these only average values, or did I miss something?

Regards Thomas


Quote from Author: Rand
Hi Mario,


Thanks for the quick reply. It makes sense, however it seems to me that this is not always the case. I had many times Dark Pilgrims or Goblin Ruffians appearing at 10'. Are these only average values, or did I miss something?

Regards Thomas

Hi Thomas,

I checked it - yes, you are right. There is an error in the distance calculation that will be fixed with the next update, sorry for this.

Regards
Mario